Analyzing the Parable of the Sadhu

Egoism: Does the execute foster the persons long term interest. here(predicate) the question is what action promotes McCoys & the hikers interest. The main purpose of all(prenominal) the hikers was to travel to Nepal and pay a once in a life term experience. It is conceivable that this is consistent with every unrivalleds best interests, while dowery the Sadhu is clearly non. sue was ethical. However the fact that McCoy feels conscience-smitten reflects that he was unable to promote his long term interest. whencece it becomes ambiguous to justify his actions. Kantian Ethics: Should abide by the hobby 2 rules: * truism should become a universal law * neer cut across tribe simply as means to an contain precisely always at the same time as ends in themselves In the parable, Stephen says that the hikers would have treated the Sadhu differently if he had been from the same ethnic group as them. However Kantian principle forbids such behaviour. One should treat all equally irrespective of ethnicity, caste, sex etc. Further, if they were treating the Sadhu as a becoming tender being, they should have understood that saving a tender-hearted life is far more valuable than accomplishing a goal. Under this principle the action was unethical. However one of the shortcomings to Kantian ethics is that it does not give priority for duties. If as a hiker my best duty is to complete my hike then in that gaffe the duty of saving a human life whitethorn fall below it. In this national the moral compositors case of a person will place which duty one must follow. Veil of Ignorance: The key is that people make decisions based on what is good for their community as a whole, and without regard to their make self-interest (since they operate ass a veil of ignorance and dont... If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, roam it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our! page: cheap essay