Theory without practice is fantasy but practice without theory is Research Paper

Theory without practice is fantasy tho practice without theory is blind. Internships in organizations - Research Paper ExampleThis could be the reason that students in universities and colleges ar usually encouraged to apply for internships in organizations dealing with their various courses of theme during school breaks over the vacation periods. Indeed, many students harness it difficult to relate what they study in school and what they have to do in the real world of corporates. On the one hand, there are academicians who study trends and historical data to come up with solutions to problems in the real world, which bathroom be adopted and used in practice. On the other hand are business executives and their workers who usually criticize academicians for coming up with solutions that are either too ideal, complex or which have too many assumptions to be employ in real businesses (March, 1994). This group approaches problem-solving through past experiences or by applying wha t is appropriate with the prevailing economic, political an social conditions. However, the reality of the matter is that none can exist without the other, as summarized by Professor Vincent Ostrom in the above phrase. One important aspect that organizations managers usually deal with is ratiocination-making. Many companies usually operate with the fix reason of making profits. This can only be possible by maximizing revenue while keeping costs down. The management of companies is usually tasked with the job of making decisions that will lead to the above. However, decision-making is a very complex activity that requires more than just the basic knowledge of how the economic conditions prevail (Scott and Davis, 2007). In addition, untimely decision-making could deal a severe blow to a company which would take years to undo, failure of which the said company would go under. In this sense, decision-making requires the use of theories enured out by people who have studied the proc ess in order to be effective. Decision-making is further complicated by the fact that human beings are not always rational hence they are prone to make decisions that are subjective rather than objective. One theory put forward to leaven to explain the decision making process is one called Bounded Rationality put forward by Nobel Price winner, Herbert A. Simon in his paper Administrative behaviour which he wrote in 1947. In this theory, Simon points out that there are several reasons as to why it may not be easy for executives to make the near rational decision. One reason is due to the uncertainty of the future. Every decision made has a consequence which might be beneficial or baneful to an organization. Some of these consequences can be anticipated, but many more cannot be known at the time of the decision-making. Therefore, managers make what they perceive to be the best decision with the information they have at hand at the period, taking into consideration known risks (Her bert, 1947). Relating to this is the fact that decision makers cannot fully evaluate the worth of their decisions in the future, but only in the present. The third impediment to rational decision making is that decision makers need to be aware of all alternatives to the decision they are intimately to make (March and Herbert, 1958). This is not always available, making it difficult to choose the most optimal decision. With such theoretical knowledge, decision makers are in a break away position to understand the decision-making process, hence be in a better position to defend their actions. Another illustration of Professor Vincent Ostroms phrase is relevant in the normal operations of a company. Companies usually spend large sums of money to train their employees and managers to